Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Are we drugging new monters and newborns?

The current emphasis by the drug companies is to help reduce mental illness by screening newborns to college students and new mothers for any symptom. This is just outright immoral and offensive to humanity.

Watch this video and think what is about to become common practice.



PS: We are moving a very wrong direction.

Dan Silver

Monday, May 11, 2009

N1H1 Virus

Well now that the great pandemic has not materilized, we are being indoctrianted that ii will be back in the fall with a vengence. How much can we believe our federal and world agencies are telling the truth? This seems to be another scare tactic to make us look for exensive preventions and cures.

The reality of it all is that the flu can be prevneted with good hygine, proper diet and adequate rest. Those that are touting the ulimate vaccine and/or vitamin are out there. The easy buck is just too hard to ignore. This is fueled even more by the new report and federal agency warnings that are issued almost daily.

We need to be alert to any disease in these times of international travel and ilncreased immigration form countries that have less control of their health care.
However itiis just not right that a panic has to be created everytime a flu bug appears. Remember that the flu vilrus can change with each individual (human or animal)it infects. We need ot be looking at the everyday habits of our own lifestyle to say ahead of the flu bugs. Eat less junk (fast food), drink more fluids (water), adequate rest and exercise.

Read additional information on the N1H1 virus Baseline of Health Foundation http://www.jonbarron.org/baseline-health-program/2009-05-11.php">Jon Barron's Alternative Health Newsletter">here

Monday, May 4, 2009

Shattered Illusions

Monday, May 04, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

Quaker Oats was started by Quakers
Ummm, not really. In fact, the company has nothing to do with Quakers. It was started in Pennsulvania in 1901 when there were lots of Quakers around, mostly due to the fact that Quakers were known as being honest.

But Quaker Oats isn't exactly honest. Today, it's actually owned by PepsiCo, and in the 1950s, Quaker Oats, Harvard University and MIT researchers conducted experiments on human children using radioactive elements to trace the flow of nutrients through their bodies. The children were invited to be part of a "special science club," but they weren't told they were being fed Quaker Oats laced with radioactive substances. Side effects of radioactive exposure include skin cell mutations and skin cancer.

When parents found out about the experiments, they sued, and Quaker Oats was eventually forced to pay out $1.85 million, but the case wasn't settled until decades later -- 1997, actually. It's all detailed in the book The State Boy's Rebellion by Michael D'Antonio. (http://www.amazon.com/State-Boys-Re...)

Sources:
MIT news: http://tech.mit.edu/V117/N65/bferna...
(Note how arrogant this MIT news story is, implying it was okay to experiment on the children because the levels of radioactivity were so low.)

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaker...

For other shateret illusions go here

Friday, May 1, 2009

Big Pharma "polypill" could be five problems in one

These excerpts are from the newsletter of William B Ferril M.D. At Health Revelations.com

They show the extent and misrepresentation of the big drug companies today. the testing of this pill is done in India with very little oversight.

"A five-way "polypill" combining the most common heart meds in one tablet has been a Big Pharma fantasy for years -- and it's now moving closer to reality. And while the media is singing its praises, no one seems to be talking about how the research is being done with drug company money in a far-off country."

"But that's a minor matter for most members of the media. Their coverage has so far been little more than a press release for a drug that's largely untested, unproven, and unnecessary."

"An Associated Press report even noted with great joy that the drug's side effects were roughly the same as the side effects one might experience when taking all five drugs separately, as if that was some great achievement. (emphasis is mine) After all, each one of those drugs offers its own laundry list of side effects."

Dan Silver